Бібліотечний вісник | bv.nbuv.gov.ua
Кубко А. - Наукометричний вимір епідемії. Частина перша. Cвітові тренди "доковідних" часів (2020)

  ARCHIVE (All issues) /     Content (2020, Issue 6)Ukrainian English

Kubko Anastasiia

Scientometric Dimensions of Epidemic. Part One. World Trends of Pre-COVID-19 Era

Abstract: Actuality. Epidemics that strain on local and global medical sectors, have long allowed bibliometrics and scientometrics specialists to identify and evaluate trends in which academic society responds to stress. Studies of epidemics (H1N1 influenza, Zika and Ebola viruses, and coronavirus diseases with acute respiratory distress syndrome (SARS and MERS)), which have occurred over the past twenty years, revealed trends and tendencies in the publishing activity of scientists, in the dynamics of citations, in the internal trends of the distribution of publishing activity in the medical science brunches and in the involvement of institutions in the scientific process. The aim of the article is to identify and summarize the trends of stress dynamics of bibliometric and scientometric indicators in response to the epidemic in the materials of Western researches, and to analyze their ability to act as components of the universal pattern of the academic community's response to challenges. Results. According to the results of Western researches, trends in academic community's output are as follows: general increase of publishing activity of scientists belonging to the branches of medical science involved in overcoming the epidemic; a constant annual average increase among new research in the field of infectious diseases; intra-industry distribution of publications with an internal trend of more significant growth of publications on the topic of sanitary and epidemiological safety (health care); identification of the leading institutions that responded most actively to the epidemic, among which the first three ones are the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the United States, WHO and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Conclusions. The analysis of the obtained data revealed that the lack of pandemic nature (ie their ability to spread to the whole world, not to certain countries) of epidemics in the last twenty years does not allow to use these trends as a general model of academic response to stress because they reflect trends only among the affected regions. At the same time, research based on data collected during the current COVID-19 coronavirus epidemic, which now covers equally the entire world, can be used to refine trends from previous decades and to establish a universal pattern of the scientific community's response to critical challenges.

Keywords: scientometrics, bibliometric indicators, medicine, COVID-19.



Author(s) citation:

Cite:
Kubko Anastasiia (2020). Scientometric Dimensions of Epidemic. Part One. World Trends of Pre-COVID-19 Era. Bibliotechnyi visnyk, (6) 15-19. (In Ukrainan). doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/bv2020.06.015


References:

  1. Fernandez-Marcial, V., Costa, L. M. and Gonzalez-Solar, L. (2016). Top Universities, Top Libraries: Do Research Services in Academic Libraries Contribute to University Output? Proceedings of the IATUL Conferences. (Paper 2). [In English].
  2. Jayabalasingham, B. and Hessen, M. (2020). Webinar: Infectious Disease Outbreak Research: Insights and Trends. [In English].
  3. Herzog, C., Hook, D. and Konkiel, S. (2020). Dimensions:Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data. Quantitative Science Studies, 1, 387–395. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00020
  4. (2020). The Elsevier Community. Infectious Disease Outbreaks Research: Insights and Trends. [In English].
  5. Bragazzi, N., Alicino, C., Trucchi, C., Paganino, C., Barberis, I., Martini, M., Sticchi, L., Trinka, E., Brigo, F., Ansaldi, F., Icardi, G. and Orsi, A. (2017). Global reaction to the recent outbreaks of Zika virus: Insights from a Big Data analysis. PLoS ONE, 12. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185263
  6. Alicino, C., Bragazzi, N. L., Faccio, V. et al. (2015). Assessing Ebola-related web search behaviour: insights and implications from an analytical study of Google Trends-based query volumes. Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 4, 54. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-015-0090-9
  7. Hrynevych, O. and Markovych, I. (2010). Hryp H1N1: uroky pandemii. [H1N1 Influenza: Lessons from a Pandemic]. Ukrainian medical journal, 5, 28–32. [In Ukrainian].
  8. Kubko, A. (2020). Bibliometrychni aspecty medychnoi nauky v koronavirusnyi period [Bibliometric aspects of medical science in the coronavirus period]. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference "Library. Science. Communication. Development of Library and Information Potential in the Context of Digitalization" (October 6–8, 2020, Kyiv). Kyiv, Ukraine. [In Ukrainian].
  9. Cervellin, G., Comelli, I. and Lippi, G. (2017). Is Google Trends a reliable tool for digital epidemiology? Insights from different clinical settings. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health, 7, 185–189. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2017.06.001