Lobuzin Ivan

Digital Libraries of the Age of E-science and Semantic Web Technologies

Abstract: A review and critical analysis of publications devoted to the competence issues of digital librarians of scientific libraries has been carried out. The range of functional requirements and librarian knowledge related to information technology is generalized. The basic tendencies of involvement of librarians in digital scientific communication are found out. The scientific and educational measures necessary for the successful participation of library specialists in digital projects of the scientific library are determined.

Keywords: digitalization of libraries, digital competencies, digital librarian, digital curaton, digital information management, research data management.

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/bv2019.06.018     Citation

• Lobuzin Ivan (Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, loboozin@nbuv.gov.ua) ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0540-4923

Cite:
Lobuzin Ivan (2019). Digital Libraries of the Age of E-science and Semantic Web Technologies. Bibliotechnyi visnyk, (6) 18-24. (In Ukrainan). doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/bv2019.06.018

References:

1. Bykov, V. Yu. and Spirin, O. M. (Eds.). (2012). Elektronni bibliotechni informatsiini systemy naukovykh i navchalnykh zakladiv: monohrafiia [Electronic library information systems of research and educational institutions: monograph]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Pedahohichna dumka. [In Ukrainian].
2. Kunanets, N. and Veretennikova, N. (2013). Problemno-oriientovani bibliotekari: dosvid mynuloho ta vymohy suchasnosti [Problem-oriented librarians, past experience and the requirements of today]. Visnyk Kharkivskoi derzhavnoi academii kultury, 40, 138-146. [In Ukrainian].
3. Audunson, R. A. and Shuva, N. Z. (2016). Digital Library Education in Europe: A Survey. SAGE Open. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015622538
4. Borrego, Б., Ardanuy J. and Urbano, C. (2018). Librarians as Research Partners: Their Contribution to the Scholarly Endeavour Beyond Library and Information Science. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(5), 663-670. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.07.012
5. British Library Labs. British Library. [In English].
6. Choo, C. W. (2002). Information Management for the Intelligent Organization: the Art of Scanning the Environment. Medford, NJ: Information Today. [In English].
7. Hey, T., Tansley, S. and Tolle, K. (Eds.) (2009). The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Redmond: Microsoft Research. [In English].
8. Fulton, B., Botticelli, P. and Bradley, J. (2011). DigIn: A Hands-on Approach to a Digital Curation Curriculum for Professional Development. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. 52(2), 95-109. [In English].
9. Higgins. S. (2008). The DCC Curation Lifecycle Model. The International Journal of Digital Curation, 3(1), 134-140. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.48
10. (2008). Information Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future: A CIBER Briefing Paper. BL (British Library), JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee), CIBER (Centre for Information Behaviour and the Evaluation of Research). London: CIBER. [In English].
11. Jones, C. and Shao, B. (2011). The net generation and digital natives: implications for higher education. Higher Education Academy. [In English].
12. Kowalczyk, S. T. (2018). Digital Curation for Libraries and Archives. Santa Barbara; California: Libraries Unlimited. [In English].
13. Kramer, B. and Bosman, J. (2015). 101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication – the Changing Research Workflow. Figshare. [In English]. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1286826
14. Living, Knowledge. (2018). The British Library 2015-2023. Second Edition. [In English].
15. Loesch, M. F. (2017). Librarian as professor: A dynamic new role model. Education Libraries, 33(1), 31-37. [In English]. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.26443/el.v33i1.287
16. Machendranath, Dr. et al. (2019). Professional Skills and Soft Skills for LIS Professional in ICT Era. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 7(1), 147-160. [In English].
17. Martin, E. and Sheehan, L. (2018). The New "Jack of All": The Evolution of the Functionality and Focus of the Academic Librarian in New Spaces and New Roles. Advances in Library Administration and Organization, 39, 67-90. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0732-067120180000039006
18. Moore, R. (2008). Towards a Theory of Digital Preservation. The International Journal of Digital Curation, 3(1), 63-75. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.42
19. Nonthacumjane, P. (2011). Key skills and competencies of a new generation of LIS professionals. IFLA Journal, 37(4), 280-288. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035211430475
20. Shahbazi, R. and Hedayati, A. (2016). Identifying digital librarian competencies according to the analysis of newly emerging IT-based LIS jobs in 2013. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(5), 542-550. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.014
21. Smits, R.-J. (2018). Plan S: Making Open Access a Reality by 2020. OA2020 Initiative. [In English].
22. Tenopir, C., Sandusky, R. J., Allard, S. and Birch, B. (2014). Research data management services in academic research libraries and perceptions of librarians. Library and Information Science Research, 36 (2). 84-90. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2013.11.003
23. Thompson, K. A. and Kellam, L. (2016). Introduction to Databrarianship: The Academic Data Librarian in Theory and Practice. Leddy Library Publications. [In English].
24. (2015). Trends in Research Libraries 2015. IFLA. [In English].