Бібліотечний вісник | bv.nbuv.gov.ua
Вернік Ю. - Організаційно-управлінські особливості діяльності віртуальної наукової біографічної лабораторії (2024)

  ARCHIVE (All issues) /     Content (2024, Issue 2)Ukrainian English

Vernik Yuliia

Organizational and management features of activity Virtual scientific biographical laboratory

Section: Organization and methodology of library affairs

Abstract: The purpose of the article is a comparative analysis of ways of organizing scientific and professional activities among traditional formal, informal groups and virtual associations of scientists. The research methodology is based on a combined methodological approach, including the analysis of literary sources, statistical data, and empirical observations. The materials used allow you to get a comprehensive view of the researched topic. The scientific novelty consists in a detailed examination of modern trends in virtual cooperation and the identification of their impact on the scientific process in the humanitarian dimension. The specifics of virtual scientific associations are studied, their possibilities for the implementation of scientific projects, as well as ensuring flexibility and cooperation in the scientific environment are revealed. Conclusions. The research findings emphasize that the organization of virtual scientific associations and the effective use of online tools are becoming a key component of modern scientific activity, particularly in the humanitarian dimension. The main emphasis is on how information and communication technologies affect the efficiency and effectiveness of such associations in conducting scientific research and joint activities. The study addresses the current topic of the growing integration of information and communication technologies in the scientific process, especially in the humanitarian sphere, and analyzes the impact of this integration on traditional methods of scientific work. A number of benefits of this approach have been identified, including increased availability of resources, improved communication and collaboration between scientists, and challenges that require further study. Based on the analysis, recommendations are presented for optimizing the work of virtual scientific groups in order to increase the efficiency of conducting research and joint scientific projects, including management strategies, the use of specialized scientific platforms and tools for flexible project management, and promoting the innovative potential of scientists in a virtual environment.

Keywords: Virtual communities, Virtual scientific biographical laboratory, information and communication technologies, project management methodologies, scientific platforms.


Author(s) citation:

Cite:
Vernik Yuliia (2024). Organizational and management features of activity Virtual scientific biographical laboratory. Bibliotechnyi visnyk, (2) 72-86. (In Ukrainan). doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/bv2024.02.072

References:

  1. Bass, Bernard M., and Ronald E., Riggio. (2006). Transformational Leadership. (2nd ed.). Mahwah, New York, USA: L. Erlbaum Associates. [In English].
  2. Billing, Tejinder K., Debmalya, Mukherjee, Ben L., Kedia, and Somnath, Lahiri. (2010). Top executives’ international expertise commitment: Exploring potential antecedents. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 31(8), 687-704. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731011094757
  3. Cascio, Wayne F. (2000). Managing a virtual workplace. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(3), 81-90. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2000.4468068
  4. Chudoba, Katherine M., Eleanor, Wynn, Mei, Lu, and Mary B., Watson-Manheim. (2005). How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization. Information Systems Journal, 15(4), 279-306. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00200.x
  5. DeRosa, Darleen M., Donald A., Hantula, Ned, Kock, and John, D’Arcy. (2004). Trust and leadership in virtual teamwork: A media naturalness perspective. Human Resource Management, 43(2-3), 219-32. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20016
  6. Gilson, Lucy L., M. Travis, Maynard, Nicole C. Jones, Young, Matti, Vartiainen, and Marko, Hakonen. (2015). Virtual Teams Research: 10 Years, 10 Themes, and 10 Opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313-37. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314559946
  7. Hoch, Julia E., and Steve W. J., Kozlowski. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 390-403. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030264
  8. Jarle, Gressgård, Leif. (2011). Virtual team collaboration and innovation in organizations. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 17(1/2), 102-19. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13527591111114738
  9. Jarvenpaa, Sirkka L., and Dorothy E., Leidner. (2006). Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4). [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00080.x
  10. Lagerström, Katarina, and Maria, Andersson. (2003). Creating and sharing knowledge within a transnational team – the development of a global business system. Journal of World Business, 38(2), 84-95. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(03)00003-8
  11. Larson, Lindsay, and Leslie A., DeChurch. (2020). Leading teams in the digital age: Four perspectives on technology and what they mean for leading teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1). [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101377
  12. Lu, Mei, Mary Beth, Watson-Manheim, Katherine M., Chudoba, and Eleanor, Wynn. (2006). Virtuality and Team Performance: Understanding the Impact of Variety of Practices. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 9(1), 4–23. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2006.10856412
  13. Malhotra, Arvind, Ann, Majchrzak, and Benson, Rosen. (2007). Leading Virtual Teams. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 60-70. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.24286164
  14. Martins, Luis L., Lucy L., Gilson, and M. Travis, Maynard. (2004). Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 805-35. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.05.002
  15. Montoya-Weiss, M. M., A. P., Massey, and M., Song. (2001). Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflictm management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1251-62. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3069399
  16. Mukherjee, Debmalya, Somnath, Lahiri, Deepraj, Mukherjee, and Tejinder K., Billing. (2012). Leading virtual teams: How do social, cognitive, and behavioral capabilities matter? Management Decision, 50(2), 273-90. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211203560
  17. Schaubroeck, John M., and Andrew, Yu. (2017). When Does Virtuality Help or Hinder Teams? Core Team Characteristics as Contingency Factors. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 635-47. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.009
  18. Schweitzer, Linda, and Linda, Duxbury. (2010). Conceptualizing and measuring the virtuality of teams. Information Systems Journal, 20(3), 267-95. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00326.x
  19. Vera, Dusya, and Mary, Crossan. (2004). Strategic Leadership and Organizational Learning. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 222-40. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2004.12736080
  20. Wakefield, Robin L., Dorothy E., Leidner, and Gary, Garrison. (2008). A Model of Conflict, Leadership, and Performance in Virtual Teams. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 434-55. [In English] doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0149
  21. Wiesenfeld, Batia M., Sumita, Raghuram, and Raghu, Garud. (2001). Organizational identification among virtual workers: the role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support. Journal of Management, 27(2), 213-29. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700205